PR180

[Phil Edwards]

On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 06:08:03PM +0100, Neil Booth wrote:
> However, the submitter claims the code is incorrect, and g++ compiles
> it without diagnostics.  It would be nice to re-word / close this PR;
> whichever is appropriate - I don't know enough C++ to call it.

I don't know whether I'm an expert, but I strongly suspect that this code
should be rejected.  I can't find anything in the standard which would
allow it.

-- 
pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com  |  pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools.  Fools are protected by more capable fools.