objc failures on branch

Phil Edwards pedwards@disaster.jaj.com
Fri Mar 2 12:30:00 GMT 2001

On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 05:21:51PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar  2, 2001, Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com> wrote:
> > AFAICT, check-g++ simply calls check-target-libstdc++, which in turn calls
> > the script.
> Nope.  That's check-c++, in the top-level directory, that runs
> check-g++ in the gcc sub-directory, that runs $(RUNTEST) --tool g++.
> Afterwards, check-c++ does indeed run check-target-libstdc++, but I'm
> concerned with check-g++.

Oh, I see what you're saying.  Yes, I made a thinko in my message.

I haven't tried check-g++ lately, but I believe that's only supposed to run
the compiler tests, not the library tests.  That is, check-g++ only checks
g++, but check-c++ checks everything associated with the c++ language.
So check-g++ interacting with libstdc++ scripts is (I think) a non-issue.

Unless I've misunderstood you again.  Are we talking at cross-purposes?  :-)


pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com  |  pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools.  Fools are protected by more capable fools.

More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list