ARM error with glibc (Illegal value for co-processor offset)

Philip Blundell philb@gnu.org
Tue Jun 12 00:04:00 GMT 2001


>Which, btw, I can't reproduce with current sources.  Can you
>either confirm it's been fixed in the last 12 days, or send
>a different test case?  Or get Richard Earnshaw to ack the
>patch on general "it looks right" principals?

I doubt it's been fixed, but it may well be that it doesn't happen with that 
testcase any more.  This bug is extremely sensitive to small variations in the 
generated code.

I'll see if I can come up with a new test case.

p.

-- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 (debian)

iD8DBQE7Jb7YVTLPJe9CT30RAs7lAJ9xRdq++sGtRVzCWdJXL51s14ZDPgCgsv3H
kzm+MeG+wa40SGJQc7aYC0o=
=xwlY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list