g++ regression - or not ?
Dirk Mueller
dmuell@gmx.net
Mon Jun 4 13:00:00 GMT 2001
On Mon, 04 Jun 2001, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > This appears to be not a regression, since according to the standard,
> > Foo::bar() indeed should be called:
> On the contrary: it is a progression. It is called now, as mandated
> by the standard, whereas it wouldn't be called in earlier versions.
Okay, thats what he said :-)
Any comment on the other part of the question ? why does gcc allow calling a
static method with a "this" pointer ? and not even warn about it ?
Dirk
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list