Bug: Failure to compile legal code (gcc-2.95.2)

[Mike Harrold]

> 
> On Jan 17, 2001, Mike Harrold <mharrold@cas.org> wrote:
> 
> > The code below fails to compile. However, if the commented line in class B
> > is uncommented, it compiles fine. I assume this is a bug, or I am missing
> > something very obvious.
> 
> IIRC, the declaration of operator<< in class B hides the one in class
> A.

The declaration of B::operator(int) hides A::operator(const char*) ?
Surely this can't be right, especially given that the operator is a
virtual function?

Regards,

/Mike