PA problem

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Feb 28, 2001, Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> wrote:

> Shouldn't there also be a non-overlap of op[4] with op[3]?

Wouldn't the earlyclobber prevent it from being shared with any input
operand, op[3] inclusive?  It seems to me that the
reg_overlap_mentioned_p()s either are redundant or pre-date the
introduction of the earlyclobber.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me