Problem with headers

[David Ronis]

Isn't 3.0 the release candidate?  In any event, shouldn't its headers
be fixed too?

David

Benjamin Kosnik writes:
 > 
 > no, not 3.0 branch. 3.1
 > 
 > 
 > On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, David Ronis wrote:
 > 
 > > 
 > > I just did a cvs update and bootstrap (3.0 branch).  The headers are
 > > still messed up, although the missing stl_hashtable.h (included from
 > > hashtable.h) is now in ext.  I changed the include in hashtable.h to
 > > point to the file in ext and things seem to work.
 > > 
 > > David
 > > 
 > >