3.1 bootstrap fails on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
Kaveh R. Ghazi
ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu
Mon Apr 9 13:24:00 GMT 2001
> I'm trying this because I expected the integration of the
> subreg-byte branch to fix 64-bit code generation on sparc,
> something I've been looking forward to for a long time.
> Brad
I disabled the 32/64 support on sparc back in October. IIRC, at the
time rth said fixing the issue related to "arbitrary precision
arithmetic", not subreg-byte. (Unless the two are related, I don't
fully understand it.)
See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-09/msg01162.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-10/msg00017.html
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi Engagement Manager / Project Services
ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu Qwest Internet Solutions
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list