3.1 bootstrap fails on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8

Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu
Mon Apr 9 13:24:00 GMT 2001


 > I'm trying this because I expected the integration of the
 > subreg-byte branch to fix 64-bit code generation on sparc,
 > something I've been looking forward to for a long time.
 > Brad

I disabled the 32/64 support on sparc back in October.  IIRC, at the
time rth said fixing the issue related to "arbitrary precision
arithmetic", not subreg-byte.  (Unless the two are related, I don't
fully understand it.)

See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-09/msg01162.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-10/msg00017.html

--
Kaveh R. Ghazi			Engagement Manager / Project Services
ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu		Qwest Internet Solutions



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list