Varargs macros subtly broken
Jamie Lokier
egcs@tantalophile.demon.co.uk
Wed Sep 27 09:03:00 GMT 2000
Neil Booth wrote:
>> *boggle* you mean this is broken even without varargs? Ouch!
>
>No, only in the varargs case.
Ah, I see. Here is my simplified test case, probably like yours:
#define half(x) ((x) / 2)
#define apply(...) apply2 (__VA_ARGS__)
#define apply2(f,x) f (x)
apply (half, X)
Expands to `half (X)' when it should expand to `((X) / 2)'.
-- Jamie
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list