On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 08:46:49PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 04:51:43AM +0200, Philipp Thomas wrote: > > +stamp-check-pot: $(POTFILES) > > + touch $@ > > The use of $@ here isn't portable. I thought it was only $<, $^, $? etc. that didn't work portably outside suffix rules. zw