ridpointer problem [Re: block reordering problem]

[Zack Weinberg]

On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 11:58:55PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 11:15:48PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > This means the memcpy() call (or the inlining) was optimized out.
> 
> The problem is that the __volatile__ qualifier got lost.  The existing
> test in c-parse.in is only true if you use "volatile", but not if you
> use either of the alternate spellings.
> 
> This fixes C, but there are many spots in the C++ front end that 
> probably need similar treatment.  Further, c-semantics.c has additional
> problems in that the definition on C_RID_CODE is not compatible
> between the C and C++ front ends.

Arrrgh.  I did think I got all of those, really.

I hate to say it, but I probably won't have time to fix this.  I'm
dropping off the network on Monday or Tuesday. :(

zw