wrong alias-analysis and strange x86-code

Alexandre Oliva aoliva@redhat.com
Tue Oct 24 17:47:00 GMT 2000


On Oct 24, 2000, Theodore Papadopoulo <Theodore.Papadopoulo@sophia.inria.fr> wrote:

> Well, correct me if I'm wrong...

If you insist... :-)

> gcc-2.95.2 had -fstrict-aliasing by default whereas it is currently 
> not enabled unless you ask for it.

IIRC, only GCC 2.95 (and possibly 2.95.1) was released with it turned
on by default.  It turned out that a lot of code wasn't strict
aliasing-ready, so we disabled it again in 2.95.2 (or was it 2.95.1?)

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me


More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list