Tue Oct 17 10:05:00 GMT 2000
I've looked at Jan's patch, and it looks OK to me --
except for the canonicalization issue that Richard pointed
out. I can't approve the patch because I don't
quite understand all the issues.
Richard, would you mind going another round with Jan
to resolve this bit?
Jan, it's just not acceptable to have the tree failing to
bootstrap like this -- especially on the platform where
you were making the changes. We're going to need to back
out your previous changes if we can't get this straightened
out in the next 24 hours or so.
Mark Mitchell firstname.lastname@example.org
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
----- Original Message -----
Sent : 10/17/00 9:32 AM
>From : Graham Stott <email@example.com>
To : Mark Mitchell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
CC : email@example.com
Subject: Re: x86 bootstrap
> This is fall out from one of Jan's recent patches.
> Take a look at the "More i386 comparison fixes" patch Jan posted to gcc-patches
> it fixes the problem for me.
Get MORE than just FREE e-mail. Get a private Web office.
Organize your team with FREE communication and
collaboration tools from HotOffice(R) at www.hotoffice.com.
More information about the Gcc-bugs