bogus error on constructor call with gcc 2.95.2

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Oct 16, 2000, Martin Sebor <sebor@roguewave.com> wrote:

> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> 
>> On Oct 16, 2000, "E. Jay Berkenbilt" <ejb@ql.org> wrote:
>> 
>> >     B(A(0, 1));
>> 
>> This is not what you think it is.  In C++, this is the same as:
>> 
>> B A(0, 1);
>> 
>> i.e., a declaration and definition of a variable named A, of type B,
>> initialized using a B's constructor that takes two arguments that can
>> be implicitly converted from `0' and `1', respectively.

> I respectfully disagree.

Thanks for setting me straight.  You're certainly right.  Sorry about
the stupidity leak :-)

I guess this falls in the category of the known parser bugs in g++,
then :-(

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me