bogus error on constructor call with gcc 2.95.2

Alexandre Oliva aoliva@redhat.com
Sun Oct 15 20:21:00 GMT 2000


On Oct 16, 2000, "E. Jay Berkenbilt" <ejb@ql.org> wrote:

>     B(A(0, 1));

This is not what you think it is.  In C++, this is the same as:

      B A(0, 1);

i.e., a declaration and definition of a variable named A, of type B,
initialized using a B's constructor that takes two arguments that can
be implicitly converted from `0' and `1', respectively.

If you want to construct a temporary, casting it to void or anything
else that disambiguates the statement so that it is cannot be
interpreted as a declaration should be fine.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me


More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list