Unresolved references to __builtin functions building libgcj

Tom Tromey tromey@cygnus.com
Thu Oct 12 11:42:00 GMT 2000


>>>>> "Kaveh" == Kaveh R Ghazi <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> writes:

Kaveh> Seems to me that the fact that the move of the C++ bits breaks
Kaveh> libgcj would have been noticed (and perhaps fixed) prior to
Kaveh> installation of the relevant patch had libgcj been in the
Kaveh> unified source tree and part of the standard build process.

Yes.

Kaveh> I'm raising this, not to be annoying :-), but because IIRC the
Kaveh> libgcj merge is one of the gcc-3.0 release criteria and I was
Kaveh> wondering what the state of this is.  Is anyone working on it?

Yes, Alex is scheduled to do it soon.  I don't remember the exact
dates offhand.

Tom

--MAA09692.971375588/creche--



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list