c++/795

[Nathan Sidwell]

Martin Sebor wrote:
> 
> I don't think it is ill-formed. From
> http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#30:
thanks, but I don't see how that is relevant. It's talking about something
in a non-template scope. Here we are in the scope of a templated member
function. Besides, disallowing template here would change the validity of
the example between paras 4 and 5 in 14.2, which is currently isomorphic
to this test case.

Do you agree?

nathan
-- 
Dr Nathan Sidwell   ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::   CodeSourcery LLC
         'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org