V3: SPARC bug and tree freeze
Mark Mitchell
mark@codesourcery.com
Sun Nov 12 05:03:00 GMT 2000
>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com> writes:
Robert> <<We already run thousands of tests before checkin,
Robert> including C, C++, Fortran, and library tests. That
Robert> already takes hours for many people; glibc takes about
Robert> that same amount of time to build, even on a fast machine.
>>>
Robert> But couldn't the needed testing be distributed on several
Robert> machines with appropriate robots, and run in parallel. I
Robert> know I am coming late to this discussion, but it does not
Robert> seem workable for the tree to get this broken to me.
Sure, we could do the mozilla-like server farm automated
test-before-checkin thing. Who's going to provide those machines?
How do we avoid the political issues that are arising out of
gcc.gnu.org's current affiliation? I have no objection to such a
system, but we can't ask people to build glibc locally before every
checkin; that's crippling.
Also, I don't think the tree is that badly broken -- failing to
compile glibc could indicate one failure, or many. I suspect a very
few.
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list