G++ reuses assembly labels
Greg Noel
GregNoel@san.rr.com
Tue May 30 18:49:00 GMT 2000
[Forwarded by Geoff Keating, due to ORBS/RoadRunner annoyance.]
At 9:01 AM -0700 5/30/00, Geoff Keating wrote:
>The current mainline (which will become 3.0 or 2.96) complains ...
>because 'or' and 'not' are reserved words in C++.
Ouch. I think they're reserved words in C, too.
The problem is that I don't own either set of sources. I'll report this to
the respective projects and see if I can get them to change the code. I'll
also suggest that they try the mainline to avoid future problems.
>The problem did appear with my stock 2.95.2 install.
So downgrading if I want to profile the code is not an option. Since I'm
not planning to profile the code (the option was in effect due to a bug in
their configure script) I'm not going to worry about it too much. If I
decide to do any profiling, I'll get the mainline.
>The problem seems to be related to output of thunks for multiple
>inheritance.
They certainly looked like thunks, but I thought they might be for
parameter coersions. Multiple inheritance makes sense, too.
Tks,
-- Greg Noel, retired UNIX guru
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list