gcc 2.95.2 bug(?): bastring::Rep not threadsafe?

[Alexandre Oliva]

On May 10, 2000, Koen Deforche <koen@easics.be> wrote:

> is it possible that bastring::Rep::grab() is non-thread safe
> (in gcc 2.95.2 / Sparc) ?

It certainly isn't.  IIRC, a thread-safe version of basic_string was
installed in libstdc++-v3 a few days ago.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva    Enjoy Guaraná, see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company        aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com
Free Software Developer and Evangelist    CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp
oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}   Write to mailing lists, not to me