cpp problem in 20000417 snapshot

[Neil Booth]

Zack Weinberg wrote:-

> This would be a natural extension, and I see that 2.95 did accept it
> (silently, even with -pedantic!)  I'll consider restoring it.
> Does anyone else have an opinion.

I vote for being as strict as we can, without breaking large code
bases.  i.e. unless similar complaints come in for a variety of other
pieces of software I vote we don't restore it.

Neil.