Miscellaneous testsuitsuite failures under hpux 10.20
John David Anglin
dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca
Wed Jun 28 21:12:00 GMT 2000
> > In message < 200006282308.QAA02706@localhost.cygnus.com >you write:
> > > > about the portability of ffs which you have used in your patch. The
> > >
> > > That's one of the reasons the patch is not committed. Probably it
> > > should use something like exact_log2, or supply its own ffs
> > > equivalent.
> > Right. We've got routines to compute log2, and presumably that's all we
> > really want/need, right?
>
> Unfortunately, what this particular code needs is exactly ffs. That's
> no problem, though, it just means we should re-implement it, perhaps
> in libiberty. [As a practical matter, nearly every platform where gcc
> is used already has ffs().] If I ever got time I could do this.
What about using floor_log2_wide in toplev.c?
Dave
--
J. David Anglin dave.anglin@nrc.ca
National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605)
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list