GCC 2.95.2 bug with typename and templates

[Nathan Sidwell]

Peter Fraser wrote:
> 
> template<class LB> class C
> {
> public:
>         typename LB::DataType;
> 
>         void FillBox(LB::DataType &info);
> };
 
> gcc is deciding that "LB::Datatype &info" is an expression
> rather that a parameter declaration. gcc is behaving as if
> it is ignoring the "typename" declaration.
you misunderstand typename. it must be used at each usage of the
type-dependant type. I.e. either [untested code coming up]

template <class LB> class C
{
public:
	typedef typename LB::DataType DataType;
	void FillBox (DataType &);
}
template<class LB> void C<LB>::FillBox(DataType &info)
{
        ;
}

or
template <class LB> class C
{
public:
	void FillBox (typename LB::DataType &);
}
template<class LB> void C<LB>::FillBox(typename LB::DataType &info)
{
        ;
}

nathan
-- 
Dr Nathan Sidwell   ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::   CodeSourcery LLC
         'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org