libio in gcc in CVS is not compatible with glibc 2.2

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Jul 18, 2000, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote:

> Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:
>> Doesn't this break the ABI?  Shouldn't the glibc change wait for a
>> major release (i.e., wait forever :-), or provide an alternate name
>> for the new, correct implementation, while deprecating the original
>> function?

> There is no ABI change, just type renaming.

Then why does the test fail?  Is it just a compiler error?  I had
understood it was a run-time error, but maybe I just assumed too much.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me