libio in gcc in CVS is not compatible with glibc 2.2

Alexandre Oliva aoliva@redhat.com
Tue Jul 18 10:23:00 GMT 2000


On Jul 18, 2000, "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> wrote:

> The return type of _IO_seekoff in glibc 2.2 is changed from _IO_pos_t
> to _IO_off_t.

Doesn't this break the ABI?  Shouldn't the glibc change wait for a
major release (i.e., wait forever :-), or provide an alternate name
for the new, correct implementation, while deprecating the original
function?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list