va_arg *, and why not.

Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
Sun Jul 16 22:25:00 GMT 2000


>>>>> "Gabriel" == Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com> writes:

    Gabriel> Hmm, I'm confused there.  I was under the impression that
    Gabriel> it was taking the address of a va_list function argument
    Gabriel> that was not portable.  Furthermore, in his proposed
    Gabriel> resolution using va_copy was one option.

But with the caveat that there be a libiberty/system.h equivalent to
handle systems that do not define va_copy.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com


More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list