va_arg *, and why not.
Mark Mitchell
mark@codesourcery.com
Sun Jul 16 22:25:00 GMT 2000
>>>>> "Gabriel" == Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com> writes:
Gabriel> Hmm, I'm confused there. I was under the impression that
Gabriel> it was taking the address of a va_list function argument
Gabriel> that was not portable. Furthermore, in his proposed
Gabriel> resolution using va_copy was one option.
But with the caveat that there be a libiberty/system.h equivalent to
handle systems that do not define va_copy.
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list