GCC and C89 Defect Report 106

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < 20000701213927.A21757@wolery.cumb.org >you write:
  > On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 09:02:20PM -0700, Geoff Keating wrote:
  > > > This is not an important issue, except in so far as it means we are
  > > > not 100% C89 conformant.
  > > 
  > > Could you install these in the testsuite (as compile tests I guess),
  > > and mark them as xfail, and put in a comment saying that they are from
  > > DR106?  That way at least we'll remember.
  > 
  > I'll do better: here's the fix.  Simple case of code not having been
  > updated for the recent change that made void an incomplete type.
  > 
  > zw
  > 
  > 	* c-typeck.c (build_indirect_ref): Use COMPLETE_OR_VOID_TYPE_P
  > 	and VOID_TYPE_P.
Fine.


  > 	* gcc.c-torture/compile/20000701-1.c: New test.
What is the legal status of this code?  ie, did you lift it from the ftp/web
site in your earlier message, and what is the copyright status of that code?


jeff