Still a lot of C++ files getting "fixed"

[Zack Weinberg]

On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 03:28:36PM -0500, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
>  > From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
>  > 
>  >     Matt> I tend to think that anyone who puts this kind of garbage in
>  >     Matt> a header deserves what they get, of course. 
>  > 
>  > True.  But, -ansi is specifically documented to be pedantically ANSI;
>  > that's its whole purpose in life.  So, either we should can it, or
>  > make sure it does what it's there fore.
> 
> I think there is a middle ground.  We certainly kill lots of
> diagnostics in system headers already because there is nothing a
> *user* can do when they get a message about a header file.
> 
> So it is not a great leap to do the same for -ansi.  It can be
> pedantically ANSI for user code, and more relaxed about system
> headers, IMHO.

If we're going to go down this road, we might consider also disabling
pedantic complaints about a token after #else/#endif in the system headers.
On SunOS, at least half the files modified have only that change.

zw