Fixing headers
Zack Weinberg
zack@wolery.cumb.org
Sun Feb 27 17:34:00 GMT 2000
On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 03:49:00PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>
> Here's another header fix that shouldn't be done.
...
> /*
> * Service registration
> *
> * svc_register(xprt, prog, vers, dispatch, protocol)
> * SVCXPRT *xprt;
> * u_long prog;
> * u_long vers;
>
> #ifdef __cplusplus
> * void (*dispatch)(...);
> #else
> * void (*dispatch)();
> #endif
> * u_long protocol; like TCP or UDP, zero means do not register
> */
>
> That's pretty gratuitous -- we're inside a comment.
I stared at this for some time last month. It's gratuitous, but it's
also completely harmless, and I cannot figure out how to tell that
we're in a comment at this point using egrep.
The file has been modified in glibc's development sources so the fix
doesn't trigger, but for some reason this wasn't put into the 2.1.x
branch.
zw
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list