UNALIGNED_WORD_ASM_OP / UNALIGNED_INT_ASM_OP
Michael Meissner
meissner@cygnus.com
Wed Feb 2 13:26:00 GMT 2000
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 12:35:37PM -0800, Geoff Keating wrote:
>
> Does anyone else think that dwarfout.c should be using
> UNALIGNED_WORD_ASM_OP, rather than UNALIGNED_INT_ASM_OP,
> for ASM_OUTPUT_DWARF_ADDR?
Well dwarfout.c doesn't define UNALIGNED_WORD_ASM_OP. Yes, I think it should,
though given that dwarf1 and coff both are only supported for C and not C++, I
dunno how much effort you want to put into it. At the least, all of the common
macros between dwarf{,2}out.c should be moved somewhere, maybe defaults.h.
--
Michael Meissner, Red Hat, Inc.
PMB 198, 174 Littleton Road #3, Westford, Massachusetts 01886
Work: meissner@redhat.com phone: 978-486-9304 fax: 978-692-4482
Non-work: meissner@spectacle-pond.org
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list