other/1493: Residual EGCS references in user documentation
Thu Dec 21 12:46:00 GMT 2000
>Synopsis: Residual EGCS references in user documentation
>Arrival-Date: Thu Dec 21 12:46:01 PST 2000
>Originator: Joseph S. Myers
>Release: 2.97 20001218 (experimental)
System: Linux decomino 2.2.18 #1 Thu Dec 14 19:30:45 UTC 2000 i686 unknown
configured with: ../gcc-cvs/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/snapshot --disable-shared --enable-threads=posix --with-system-zlib
The following non-historical references to EGCS remain in GCC in what
may be considered user-visible documentation (after
<URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-12/msg01094.html >), and
really ought to be fixed.
libio/ NEWS:*** Major changes in libio for egcs:
libstdc++/ NEWS:*** Noteworthy changes in libstdc++ for EGCS
If the old libstdc++ remains in GCC for GCC 3.0, then these files need
something added at the top to clearly state their relation to GCC and
the obsolescence of the old libstdc++.
The list needs either
* to be marked as a historical list relating to an obsolete compiler
version, namely such-and-such an EGCS version; or
* (preferred) to be updated to relate to GCC 3.0, and to be marked as
relating to GCC 3.0 rather than EGCS.
libffi/README:Libffi has been tested with the egcs 1.0.2 gcc compiler. Chances are
libffi/README:EGCS 1.0.1 (and probably other versions of EGCS/GCC) also has a
libffi/README:only single-precision, but EGCS stores single-precision arguments as
These references need to be updated to relate to non-ancient GCC
versions. Especially, the latter two describe a problem with EGCS
1.0.1 as something current; if the problem is fixed, it should be
clearly listed as a historical note if retained; if not, it should say
something like "all GCC versions from at least EGCS 1.0.1 through to
Find references to this mysterious "EGCS" thing as if it were
something current in the documentation.
More information about the Gcc-bugs