PATCH: Missing return_label using g++ CVS under vax ultrix.
Jason Merrill
jason@redhat.com
Thu Dec 14 09:06:00 GMT 2000
>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 11:11:34AM +0000, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> Richard, was there a rationale for this hunk, or were you just being tidy?
> There was a named return value test that Did The Wrong Thing.
Hmm? I'm referring to this change. I don't see a named return value test
here.
*** semantics.c Tue Dec 12 10:58:03 2000
--- semantics.c.~1~ Tue Dec 5 10:53:25 2000
*************** genrtl_finish_function (fn)
*** 2603,2610 ****
/* Finish building code that will trigger warnings if users forget
to make their functions return values. */
! if (no_return_label || cleanup_label)
! emit_jump (return_label);
if (no_return_label)
{
/* We don't need to call `expand_*_return' here because we don't
--- 2603,2609 ----
/* Finish building code that will trigger warnings if users forget
to make their functions return values. */
! emit_jump (return_label);
if (no_return_label)
{
/* We don't need to call `expand_*_return' here because we don't
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list