problem with explicit template function specification

[Martin v. Loewis]

> I think the `template' keyword is only required when the object type
> is template-dependent.  In this case, it wasn't, so GCC shouldn't
> require the `template' keyword.  But this is one of the bugs that are
> unlikely to be fixed before the C++ parser rewrite.

Right. I was confusing it with the use of 'typename', again...

Regards,
Martin