> At 16:30 01.09.99 , Richard Earnshaw wrote: > >If so, can I fix this by rewriting it in terms of a full reg-set? or is > >there a simpler way? > > cvs update? :-) > Definitely an easier way :-) > rth fixed that yesterday. > I'm a bit behind with tracking gcc-patches at the moment, or I would probably have seen this myself. Thanks anyway. Richard.