C++ BUGS: comma operator

Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
Tue Sep 7 08:47:00 GMT 1999


Nathan --

  These test-cases are fine, except that new expected-to-fail tests
should be marked with XFAIL.  The regression test-suite should not
double as the bug database.  (Jason Molenda has got us a nice GNATS
database set up; we just have to start using it.)  When people run
`make check-g++', there should be no unexpected failures, unless
they've just broken something.  That makes it very easy for developers
to know they've not screwed up; otherwise, you need to know the magic
list of tests that are OK to fail.

  Thanks!

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com


More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list