HP/UX 10.20 vanilla <-> gcc-2.95.2

[Philipp Buehler]

N8TM@aol.com wrote To martin@mira.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de:
> In a message dated 10/30/99 3:51:21 PM EST, martin@mira.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de 
> writes:
> 
> > I thought we were talking about building GCC; how is building binutils
> >  relevant, here? I still don't see why any trickery with lex (be it
> >  installing flex, or removing libl) is necessary to build gcc.
> Unfortunately, I'm working from memory, but binutils is needed to build gcc 
> properly, and I believe it was in the binutils configure where it wants to 
It was not necessary, however, the make is not really nice afterwards
due to lots of warnings about -g.
And the install/SPECIFIC should include a note about gmake.

--- End of mail from N8TM@aol.com ---
ciao
-- 
Philipp Buehler, aka fIpS | BOfH | NUCH | double-p on IRC
I think I go insane; a silent virus takes control and puts me on the screen
My memory on empty hole; no one to hear me scream 
HIGH TECH, HIGH TECH -- LOW LIFE                        --Krupps,1991