template fct overloading

[Stefan Schwarzer]

// I cannot see a problem with the syntax of the following 
// fragment; shouldn't one be able to overload template and 
// non-template functions in class scopes and be able to declare 
// those out of line?  From the examples in Sec. 14 of the standard
// my guess is that this is the intended syntax for this purpose.

// as alluded to, the inline definition of the functions IN the class 
// body works as expected


template<int N>
struct A {
  int f();  

  template<int M>
  int f();
};

template<int N> template<int M>
int A<N>::f(){ return M; } 

template<int N>
int A<N>::f(){ return 1; }