Regression in gcc-2.95 19990525
H.J. Lu
hjl@osmium.su.varesearch.com
Mon May 31 21:06:00 GMT 1999
>
>
> In message < 19990526133153.C2494666E@osmium.su.varesearch.com >you write:
> > With gcc 2.95 19990525, I got this on x86:
> >
> > # gcc -S -O3 -mcpu=i686 -march=i686 foo.c
> > foo.c: In function `main':
> > foo.c:27: Could not split insn
> > (insn 116 112 61 (set (reg/v:SI 5 %edi)
> > (if_then_else:SI (ne:SI (reg/v:SI 3 %ebx)
> > (mem/s:SI (plus:SI (mult:SI (reg/v:SI 4 %esi)
> > (const_int 4 [0x4]))
> > (reg:SI 0 %eax)) 3))
> > (mem/s:SI (plus:SI (mult:SI (reg/v:SI 4 %esi)
> > (const_int 4 [0x4]))
> > (mem/f:SI (plus:SI (reg:SI 6 %ebp)
> > (const_int 12 [0xc])) 0)) 3)
> > (reg/v:SI 5 %edi))) 414 {movsicc+2} (insn_list/j/c 112 (insn_li
> > st/j
> > 138 (insn_list/j/c 112 (nil))))
> > (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 0 %eax)
> > (nil)))
> >
> > egcs 1.1.2 is ok. It is a new bug.
> Thanks. I just verified that my recent reload patch fixed this bug.
>
Thanks. I used gcc-2.95 19990531 to build glibc 2.1.2 and Linux
2.2.9. They all seem to work fine.
--
H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list