is it a bug

[Franz Sirl]

At 18:29 05.05.99 , Jeffrey A Law wrote:

>   In message < 4.2.0.37.19990505180603.036fb240@mail.lauterbach.com >you write:
>   > At 17:37 05.05.99 , Jeffrey A Law wrote:
>   > this work on the PA, did it fix bugs too?
>It was strictly optimization work.

OK.

>   > I'm asking cause I just noticed
>   > that the FAIL of compile/980329-1.c is gone on the PA since around
>   > beginning of April, but I still get it on PPC.
>   > Any hints on that?
>Nope.  Sorry.

I hoped I could gather some hints if this FAIL would have been related to 
the backend.

So judging from my debug session in 
http://egcs.cygnus.com/ml/egcs-bugs/1999-02/msg00442.html , there's still a 
problem in the loop unroller (if it is not as simple as adding a check for 
insn==NULL to single_set or can_reverse_comparison).

Franz.