gcc-2.95pre rs6000-ibm-aix fix-header bug still present

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < 9906202053.AA31894@marc.watson.ibm.com >you write:
  > 	Sigh.  Bootstrapping with gcc-1.1 does not produce the extraneous
  > definitions of EXIT_SUCCESS and EXIT_FAILURE.  Bootstrapping with IBM's
  > XLC does.  fixincl successfully built and was used in both instances.
  > 
  > 	Does this new fixincludes procedure use "$(CC) -E" to run a
  > preprocessor and get different programs?  I do not understand what
  > difference the the build process could account for the different fixincl
  > results.  I sincerely doubt that something is being miscomplied.
You're getting confused re: fixinc vs fixheader

fix-header solves a different set of problems than fixinc.  fix-header
has _not_ significantly changed in a long time.

EXIT_SUCCESS/EXIT_FAILURE stuff is done by fix-header and should be
totally uneffected by the fixincl rewrite.
jeff


  > 
  > David
  >