Another incompatibility of a CPPLIB based cpp?

[Manfred Hollstein]

Zack,

thanks for your patch; it fixes my problem indeed! I just ran a full
bootstrap and check without a regression to the sources without your
patch being applied.

BTW, I just saw that you installed a testcase for this problem; although
it was semantically correct, it failed to compile properly due to a
missing ';' after a variable's definition. I installed a patch for
that under the "fixes obvious prob" rule.

Later,
manfred

On Sun, 4 July 1999, 17:41:04, zack@rabi.columbia.edu wrote:

 > 
 > I'm not sure you should be counting on this behavior; 210x70-108-0 is
 > not a legal C token.  However, please try this patch.
 > 
 > zw
 > 
 >  p.s. I haven't received your mail for some reason (I'm not on the list right
 > now).
 > 
 > 1999-07-04 Zack Weinberg <zack@rabi.columbia.edu>
 > 
 > 	* cpphash.c (unsafe_chars): Correct rule about extending a
 > 	pp-number with + or -.
 > 	(macroexpand): If raw_before, trim leading space and markers
 > 	from argument.
 > 

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

1999-07-05  Manfred Hollstein  <mhollstein@cygnus.com>

	* gcc.dg/990703-1.c (y): Terminate definition syntactically correctly.

1999-07-04  Zack Weinberg  <zack@rabi.columbia.edu>

	* gcc.dg/990703-1.c: New test.

diff -rup -x CVS -x RCS -x *.o -x *.info* -x *.html* -x *.elc -x *.dvi -x *.orig -x *~ -x version.el egcs-19990704.orig/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/990703-1.c egcs-19990704/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/990703-1.c
--- egcs-19990704.orig/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/990703-1.c	Sun Jul  4 18:28:56 1999
+++ egcs-19990704/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/990703-1.c	Mon Jul  5 09:39:21 1999
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ int
 main(void)
 {
     char *x = SP1(0,MZ);
-    char *y = "0-0"  /* should be the expansion of SP1(0,MZ) */
+    char *y = "0-0";  /* should be the expansion of SP1(0,MZ) */
 
     if(strcmp(x, y))
 	return 1;