C++: Parser regression over 1.1.2

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < 4.2.0.58.19990702133700.03a16410@mail.lauterbach.com >you write:
  > Well, I wonder how you passed the RH-6.0 building tests then?
A few things never passed.  KDE in particular.

  > I thought it was a goal that RH-6.0 should build with gcc-2.95, except
  > for bugs in the sources? And KDE in RH6.0 triggers this a few times. All
  >  other bugs  triggered by RH-6.0 (not counting the PPC specific gen_reload
  >  one) have  been fixed, AFAIK. Has this goal been relaxed?
Goal != requirement.  I would have loved to had this fixed, but other more
pressing stuff had to take priority.  There are only so many hours in each
day, and I've been spending far too many in front of the computer lately.

  > Well, KDE and qt-1.4x are quite popular :-).
I had no problems at all building qt.

  > Ugh, the release is that close? Without any publicly announced beta phase?
We've been in beta for over a month.  What do you think we've been doing since
we branched?


jeff