[STL] standard compliance

Alexandre Oliva oliva@dcc.unicamp.br
Wed Jan 20 22:33:00 GMT 1999

On Jan 21, 1999, Jeff Murphy <jcmurphy@smurfland.cit.buffalo.edu> wrote:

> lack of things like list.h algo.h etc. SUN claims that it is complying with 
> the standard (see bottom) and implying that EGCS is not. who is correct?

Both.  The Standard defines <list>, <algorithm>, etc, but there are
backward-compatibility header file in egcs that bring std::list and
std::[your_favorite_algorithm] into the global namespace.

> is EGCS's STL implementation compliant?

I can't promise it's 100% compliant, but it's close enough for me.

Alexandre Oliva  http://www.dcc.unicamp.br/~oliva  aoliva@{acm.org}
Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brasil

More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list