G77 fork problems

Craig Burley burley@gnu.org
Wed Jan 20 11:32:00 GMT 1999


>Yes for your first comment.
>Second, i was thanking him.  He deserves many more thanks for his
>friendly and detailed answers whenever I wrote to him.

That's consistent with what I've seen over here on egcs-bugs!

>And by the way thanks to you to for this kind of e-mail.

Sure, well, it was mostly a sanity-check on my part.  I'm still trying
to get my new email setup working, and have not felt "on top of" things
in g77-land for some time.  Wanted to make sure there wasn't some
g77-defined way of doing fork() that I didn't know about, etc.  :)

        tq vm, (burley)

>From: Craig Burley <burley@gnu.org>
>To: <Ssiddiqi@InspirePharm.Com>
>Cc: <khan@xraylith.wisc.edu>; <d.love@dl.ac.uk>; <ssiddiqi@ipass.net>;
><gnu-win32@cygnus.com>; <egcs-bugs@cygnus.com>; <burley@gnu.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 1999 1:50 PM
>Subject: Re: G77 fork problems
>
>>>Actually G77 way of handeling FORK makes more sense to
>>>me -- personally.
>>
>>Could you elaborate?  I thought Mumit had explained g77 *doesn't*
>provide
>>a wrapper for fork().  Do you mean you prefer the interface Mumit
>>provided in his (sample) wrapper?  If so, he's the one to thank, not
>>g77!
>>
>>        tq vm, (burley)



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list