C++: ICE 61

[Martin v. Loewis]

> I don't even quite believe this comment, but I think it's probably
> truish.  Basically, the whole concept here needs more commentary: why
> do we have to re-lookup the name?  Presumably because we don't yet
> have a decent parser.  Why do we do lookup_field, rather than just
> lookup_name/lookup_name_real?  Note that lookup_field will not return
> functions.  Why are we ignoring member functions here?

These are all very good questions. I'll try to investigate a bit
further, and see what I find.

Regards,
Martin