egcs-1.1b alpha-dec-osf3.2 internal error in change_address()
Jeffrey A Law
Fri Apr 30 23:15:00 GMT 1999
In message < Pine.BSF.4.02A.email@example.com >you write:
> The short answer is line 3782 in alpha.c:alpha_expand_epilogue
> fp_is_frame_pointer = ((TARGET_OPEN_VMS && vms_is_stack_procedure)
> || (!TARGET_OPEN_VMS && frame_pointer_needed));
> But I guess you'll bounce right back and ask me why frame_pointer_needed
> is 1? If it's not the obvious answer that "it's the default for
> non-optimizing compilations", I'll have to look some more.
Nobody actually tests frame pointer elimination when the optimizer is off.
At least very few people do :-) I did a few years ago and things basically
work (no suprise since some targets have eliminations that must always be
performed even when not optimizing, like arg->fp).
More information about the Gcc-bugs