Memory usage
Mike Stump
mrs@wrs.com
Fri Apr 30 23:15:00 GMT 1999
> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 02:36:54 +0200
> From: jakob@ostenfeld.dk
> To: Mike Stump <mrs@wrs.com>
>
> On Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 05:05:58PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> > Try -fno-inline-functions and -fno-inline.
> >
> > Let us know if it works for you... If it does, then this should be a
> > FAQ answer.
>
> Wow !
>
> It did ! 8)
>
> With CPPFLAGS = -mcpu=i686 -O6 -pipe -fno-inline-functions -fno-inline
> Around 13 Megs, runtime < 1 minute
>
> With CPPFLAGS = -mcpu=i686 -O6 -pipe -fno-inline-functions
> > 500 Megs, runtime was > 15 minutes before I killed it
>
> With CPPFLAGS = -mcpu=i686 -O6 -pipe -fno-inline
> Around 13 Megs, runtime < 1 minute
>
> With CPPFLAGS = -mcpu=i686 -O6 -pipe
> Around 535 Megs, runtime > 30 minutes.
>
> It seems that -fno-inline implies -fno-inline-functions, or ?
Ok, I just wanted to be safe in what I sent you, being redundant is ok.
> I couldn't find -fno-inline or -finline in the docs,
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list