current egcs miscompiles glibc-2.1's inline math

[Richard Henderson]

On Tue, Apr 13, 1999 at 09:59:27PM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> So, don't we currently split FP cmovs?

Hum.  We do.  I hadn't noticed before.  Bother.  I guess leave them
alone, despite wanting to have a hard and fast rule.

> Do we have a comment anywhere in the x86 port to note that we can't split
> x86 FP instructions?

I don't think so.  :-(  When I was brutally reminded of this fact
when doing recent Cygnus work I added about 50 of them.

If we can agree on an rtl representation, Jan's chomping at the bit
to clean this up correctly.  Though I guess this change shouldn't be
in 1.2 no matter how fast he can work.


r~