g++/cygwin-B19 linkage problem, multiple definitions
Mumit Khan
khan@xraylith.wisc.edu
Thu Oct 29 14:33:00 GMT 1998
Jason Merrill <jason@cygnus.com> writes:
> >>>>> Mumit Khan <khan@xraylith.wisc.edu> writes:
>
> > Also, I may be completely off the base here, but wasn't there something
> > about MIPS port not liking this change (and hence Jason's Oct 13 change
> > to mips/iris6.h and varasm.c)?
>
> Yes. And you'll also need
>
> * decl2.c (finish_vtable_vardecl): Check DECL_INTERFACE_KNOWN
> instead of linkage.
>
> I wasn't planning to put this change in because of the follow-on patches it
> required, but I could be convinced if it's a serious problem.
>
Well, I have a folder full of bug reports that all lead to this. However,
it has a trivial workaround (define a destructor, even if empty), so it's
not crucial. The trouble is when you're using a library with such cases,
and then you're stuck.
I did run the testsuite and no regressions on x86-win32 and ix86-linux.
Of course, the testsuite doesn't really test for lots of things that can
go wrong here.
Mumit
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list