const without initor wrongly permitted ?

[Alexandre Oliva]

David C Binderman <dcb@pncl.co.uk> writes:

> One of the reasons why I post test cases not in the required format
> is to ensure that someone has to form a second opinion on them.

Then I'll make sure I won't just add them to the testsuite before
double-checking any of them. :-)

> I don't trust my ability to language-lawyer the C++ standard anymore,
> and I am keen to improve the quality of the egcs C++ test suite.

Anyway you've been doing a very good job at bug reporting. :-)

And for quite a long time; I remember lots of bug reports submitted by 
you in the ancient g++ bug report repository...

-- 
Alexandre Oliva
mailto:oliva@dcc.unicamp.br mailto:oliva@gnu.org mailto:aoliva@acm.org
http://www.dcc.unicamp.br/~oliva
Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brasil